On September 26, 2024, a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) was published in the Federal Register to establish regulations that would generally prohibit the sale or import into the United States of certain “connected vehicles” integrating specific pieces of hardware and software, or those components sold separately, with a sufficient nexus to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or Russia (the Proposed Rule).[1] The Proposed Rule, which was issued by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), follows an earlier Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) published on March 1, 2024 and addresses comments received in response to the ANPRM.[2]
Continue Reading Commerce Takes Next Step in Furtherance of Import Prohibition on Connected Vehicles and Systems from China and RussiaUK National Security Regime: Annual Report 2024 and Observations on Recent Practice
On 10 September 2024, the UK Government published its third Annual Report (the “Report”) on the enforcement of the National Security and Investment Act 2021 (the “NSI Act”), covering the period from 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024.
Continue Reading UK National Security Regime: Annual Report 2024 and Observations on Recent PracticeCommerce Imposes Export Controls on Quantum Computing and Other Advanced Technologies, Expands Scope of CFIUS Mandatory Filing Requirement
On September 6, 2024, the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) published an interim final rule (IFR) implementing new export controls on quantum computing items and other advanced technologies.[1] In addition to subjecting these so-called critical and emerging technologies to more stringent export controls, investments by foreign persons into U.S. companies that develop or produce such technologies could be subject to mandatory Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) filing requirements.[2]
Continue Reading Commerce Imposes Export Controls on Quantum Computing and Other Advanced Technologies, Expands Scope of CFIUS Mandatory Filing RequirementCFIUS Releases 2023 Annual Report: Key Takeaways
The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) recently published its 2023 Annual Report, which provides information regarding transactions reviewed by CFIUS in 2023.[1] Key takeaways from the 2023 Annual Report are below.
Continue Reading CFIUS Releases 2023 Annual Report: Key TakeawaysTreasury Takes Next Step on Implementation of Outbound Investment Regime, Clarifies Certain Aspects of Prior Proposal
The U.S. Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) recently issued a long-awaited Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (the “Proposed Rule”) that would create an outbound investment regime whereby U.S. persons would be prohibited from making, or required to notify the U.S. government regarding, certain investments in entities engaged in certain activities relating to semiconductors and microelectronics, quantum information technologies, and artificial intelligence in “countries of concern” (presently limited to China, Hong Kong, and Macau).[1]
Continue Reading Treasury Takes Next Step on Implementation of Outbound Investment Regime, Clarifies Certain Aspects of Prior ProposalTreasury Issues Proposed Rule to Expand CFIUS Jurisdiction Over Real Estate Transactions Near Military Installations
On July 8, 2024, the U.S. Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”), as Chair of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”), issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (the “Proposed Rule”) that would modify and expand CFIUS’s jurisdiction over certain transactions by foreign persons involving real estate in the United States.
Continue Reading Treasury Issues Proposed Rule to Expand CFIUS Jurisdiction Over Real Estate Transactions Near Military InstallationsThe European Commission targets Chinese battery electric vehicles with provisional duties to counteract subsidies
On July 4, 2024, the European Commission imposed provisional countervailing duties on imports of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) from China.
Continue Reading The European Commission targets Chinese battery electric vehicles with provisional duties to counteract subsidiesCleary Gottlieb FDI Newsletter: April – June 2024
- Belgium issues first statistics on its FDI regime: vast majority cleared in phase I, a handful in phase II, and one ex officio investigation.
- EU Commission starts showing its teeth in the enforcement of the Foreign Subsidies Regulation, with the first ex officio investigations.
- France publishes its 2023 FDI report, with filing numbers and outcomes that are largely consistent with previous years.
- Germany’s plans to overhaul its FDI regime slow down amid political controversies.
- Italy authorizes Safran’s acquisition of RTX’s actuator business, reversing its initial veto, in light of Safran’s commitments.
- Rotterdam court issues first judgment under the new Dutch FDI regime, ruling against the Government.
- Four years of Spanish FDI screening: an overview.
- UK Government issues updated guidelines on National Security & Investment Act (NSIA).
- President Biden issues order requiring Chinese owner to divest cryptocurrency mining facility near U.S. military base.
Sanctions, Certainty and Pragmatism – the Contemporary Context for Analysing Force Majeure clauses
Following a long and somewhat sleepy existence on the margins of contractual interpretation case law, force majeure clauses (“FMCs”) found themselves subject to a rude awakening with the global onset of COVID in 2020, and consequent interruptions to all manner of contracts relating to global supply chains, major sporting events, and many other facets of business. The judicial analysis of how and when FMCs are engaged in international commerce has continued post-COVID, with the introduction of wide-ranging Sanctions against Russia.
Continue Reading Sanctions, Certainty and Pragmatism – the Contemporary Context for Analysing Force Majeure clausesNew Russian Decree Imposes Restrictions on Transfer of IP Rights
On May 20, 2024, President Putin signed Decree No. 430 (the “Decree”), effective the same day. The Decree establishes restrictions on the acquisition of IP rights by Russian persons from so-called “unfriendly” jurisdictions. The term “unfriendly” jurisdiction has been used in other countersanctions regulations and includes all foreign states that commit unfriendly acts towards the Russian Federation and Russian legal entities and natural persons (i.e., countries that have introduced sanctions against Russia, including the European Union, United Kingdom, and United States).
Continue Reading New Russian Decree Imposes Restrictions on Transfer of IP Rights